2015
About Archificials: Discipline-Agnostic AI Consultancy
ARCHIFICIALS ■ ARCHIFICIALS ■ ARCHIFICIALS ■ ARCHIFICIALS ■
some numbers
+
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Years of experience
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
%
Deployment Rate
+
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Successful Projects
subtle but important:
Good "Process"Feels productive
Good Outcomes Are Productive.
Most People Can't Tell The Difference.
The Problem Was Obvious
The Pattern Kept Repeating
Different markets. Different roles. Different firm sizes. The same problem everywhere.
Firms with brilliant staff and talent losing bids and clients to competitors with more efficient solutions. Mid-market practices bleeding talent to companies offering cutting-edge tools. Companies spending 60% of project time on documentation instead of production. Partners making technology decisions based on what they already own and know rather than what their projects and clients need.
AECOM's MENA design center. Perkins + Will's regional expansion. Arqui9's $2M visualization practice serving global clients. Gensler's post-pandemic operational stress. You name it. Different contexts. Identical diagnosis.
Way too many industries worship service excellence to end up handicaping themselves with technology from 2010.
2019
While the Gap Kept Growing
Large firms have R&D departments they don't use properly. Small firms can't afford the overhead. Mid-market practices (the 20 to 100 person studios doing the industry's best work) get crushed in the middle.
They hire external consultants when they should own the capability. They lose senior talent who want modern and more efficient workflows. They compete against firms that automated these problems two years ago. They know something needs to change. They just don't know what.
Meanwhile, clients expect everyone to have the right technological stack fit for their goals. Enterprise platforms target Fortune 500 budgets while technology consultants write strategy documents nobody implements.
The gap between "we should probably do something about it" and "we' actually didI" kept widening.
2021
And Solutions Were Missing
The tools existed. The talent existed. The need definitely existed.
What didn't exist were those who could understand both sides, who'd managed real projects with real budgets and real consequences, with years of research on IA and advanced computational tools below their belts to build the bridge mid-market firms needed.
Enterprise firms have innovation labs producing work nobody uses. Academics build theoretical frameworks with no deployment path. Technology consultants promise transformation without implementation.
Archificials exists because the market failed to connect proven practice with emerging capability. That's not a technology problem. That's a delivery problem.
And delivery problems get solved by people who've delivered.
and regardless,
we kept seeing the same pattern:
01.
Speed was The Only Capability That mattered
Clients would send us projects other firms couldn't handle themselves. Not because they lacked talent, or had better designs or strategies. But simply because we could make it happen faster.
02.
Faster Always Beats Better
Firms would lose bids to competitors with worse portfolios but faster turnaround. Every single time, speed beats quality.
03.
Buying Technology Doesn't Mean Using It
They would spend $200K on software licenses and use maybe 30% of the capability. The other 70%? Just sitting there. Unused. Expensive.
04.
Most of what you call Work Isn't really work
Project teams would spend 60% of their time on coordination and documentation. Only 40% on actual work. Everyone accepted this as normal. Except for clients who eventually did the math and got tired of picking up the bill.
05.
Institutional Knowledge Walks Out Every Day
Top talent would leave. Twenty years of knowledge would walk out the door. Firms would scramble to document it. Then nobody would read the documentation.
06.
Tools Beat Talent Now
Good people working with bad tools, losing to average people working with good tools.
